Search Results for 'Rottschaefer'


Resource: Behavior and Philosophy, 42, 1-26 (2014). CAN WE RESP…
ABSTRACT: I critically review Bruce N. Waller's Against Moral Responsibility (2011), in which he argues that the moral responsibility system can and ought to be abandoned and that it be replaced with a take-charge responsibility system. Taking the perspec…
Resource: Behavior and Philosophy, 42, 27-36 (2014). THE SCIENT…
ABSTRACT: In Against Moral Responsibility, the rejection of moral responsibility is based on appeal to basic beliefs about fairness (beliefs that are widely shared and naturally explicable, but not subject to rational or scientific confirmation). However,…
Resource: Behavior and Philosophy, 37, 195-216 (2009). MORAL AG…
Arguably, one of the most exciting recent advances in moral philosophy is the ongoing scientific naturalization of normative ethics and metaethics, in particular moral psychology. A relatively neglected area in these improvements that is centrally importa…
Resource: Behavior and Philosophy, 31, 225-249 (2003).ASSESSING…
In this paper I examine the feminist claim that non-epistemic values ought to play a role in scientific inquiry. I examine four holist arguments that non-epistemic values ought to play a role not only in the external aspects of scientific inquiry such a…
Resource: Behavior and Philosophy, 27, 19-49 (1999). MORAL LEAR…
In this paper, illustration on how findings in moral developmental psychology illuminate and advance the discussion of a longstanding issue in moral ontology, that of moral realism. To do this, the author examined Gilbert Harman and Nicholas Sturgeon
  Page: 1/1  
Copyright ©1997-2017 by the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. All rights reserved.

The text of this website is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License.